Follow:

    A surprising red lip trio

    While hunting for jeans a few weeks ago, my sister (Rita) and I came across a cute lip gloss trio next to the till in the Gap. I compulsively always check ingredients lists when I see new lip products (Ri’s sensitive to parabens, peppermint, nut oils…) and these were no exception.

    Long story short, we ended up bringing home three new glosses, along with some pants.

    What it is: Gap Color + Shine for lips lipgloss trio (only available in-store)

    The formula: I’m not totally in love with these, but they’re a lot nicer than I was expecting them to be. They smell kind of like a minty vanilla and wear for about 2-3 hours (the darker shades leave a stain for longer). I was expecting the glosses to be gloopy, sticky messes, but they’re actually really smooth — heavy, of course, with a tiny bit of tackiness if you smack your lips together, but FAR from sticky. These glosses actually remind me a lot of one of my drugstore faves, CoverGirl’s Amazemint line.

    The shades: These were what really sold me on the glosses; let’s be honest. As you all know, I love a smooth, shimmer-free red, and am always on the hunt for a creamy nude. This had both, so we had to give it a try!

    • The dark red: a fairly neutral, shimmer-free brownish-berry. This is one of my favourite types of red: it’s the perfect alternative to the B-O-L-D red lip! The medium-sheer formula gives you lots of elbow room (it’s easy to get a little more or a little less colour), and it leaves a nice stain behind.
    • The medium red: the only shimmery shade of the trio, and the most “fun.” This one is on the warmer side, almost an orange-red, but it isn’t so warm that it looks funny on my cool-toned complexion. I can’t feel the shimmer particles, and to be honest, I kinda like the fresh, juicy look this shade imparts! Like the dark red, its pigmentation is medium as well, and it leaves a pretty stain.
    • The medium nude: as expected, this is the most sheer! It just barely tones down my lips, but it does give a really natural-but-hydrated look. If you’re slicking on gloss without a mirror, this is the shade to go with :o)

    (this is a bit blurry, yes, but it shows off the shine quite well!)

    The verdict? At $12.50 for three glosses (that’s about $4 a shade), these are a definite YES! The formula’s more than decent and the colours are great. I’m still stunned that I like a clothing-line gloss this much :P Ri turned out to be allergic to them anyways (we’re thinking she may be allergic to cinnimates as well), but that’s a-okay with me!

    P.S. The dark shade is actually a great dupe for MAC Plum Perfect Tinted Lip Conditioner. It’s a little less brown, but seeing as they wear for the same length of time and even smell similar, I think I’ll forgive the minor differences in favour for the price difference (MAC’s TLCs are $17.50 in Canada; ouch!)

    Here it is next to Plum Perfect (left) and a discontinued gloss that I was hoping it would be a dupe for (right; it wasn’t, unfortunately)…

    Share:

    Crazy prices, Holiday 2010 edition (part 2!)

    Here’s part two of the $100-and-up items! (Check out part one here.) These ones are the sets and kits, so yah, they’re a little more reasonable… but just a little :P

    Oh! Here’s some more Holiday stuff if you’re still trying to figure out what to buy your friends and family interested:

    • The Gift Guide {here},
    • The Lazy Lady’s Guide to the Holidays {here},
    • And ALL of our Holiday 2010 coverage {here}!
    Share:

    Check out our two newest advertisers…

    The one change you may have noticed when we came over to thenotice.net? Ads. Which is to say, we now have a few tucked away in our sidebar, and as unobtrusive as they are, they still do exist. Unfortunately, hosting your own domain, attaching an email to that, storing your files in the mysterious depths of the interwebs… all those things cost money, and as a University student, I’m not exactly made of it.

    (Actually, I’m pretty sure that, by definition of being a human, I’m not made of it. Hmm, food for thought.)

    Anyhow, I wanted to give a bit of a shout-out to our two most recent advertisers, Subversive Apothecary and Vicious Cosmetics. Why? No particular reason, it’s not contractual or anything — I just think they’re awesome small businesses that deserve a bit of love. So, please do give ’em a click when you have the time!

    Just a bit of background: Subversive Apothecary is based out of Virginia, makes all its products in the good ol’ US of A, and doesn’t test on animals. They sell just one product, an anti-ageing serum, and even have a page on their site that breaks down and describes all of the ingredients that go into the serum! (The serum, for the record, is free of both parabens and silicones. We approve!)

    Vicious Cosmetics, our other small-business advertiser right now, is owned and operated out of Florida. They have a much larger range of products — right now, it’s just a huge range of really vivid eyeshadows, but they’ll be expanding into lip products soon, too. They support animal activism and being green, and you can ship them your empty Vicious packaging for a discount. (Sorta like Back-2-MAC. Cool, right?) Oh! Plus, they have swatches of their products up on their site, which is also pretty awesome.

    So… yeah. Give ’em a look; they deserve it! I mean, all our advertisers technically “deserve it,” but I like supporting small businesses (and I hope you guys do, too!)

    Share:

    Crazy prices, Holiday 2010 edition

    I indulged my (unhealthy) fascination for exorbitant prices last year, and you ladies seemed to really like it…. so I figured, why not do it again this year?

    Here’s a list of gorgeous $100-and-up beauty items that you can lust after this year! Anything catch your eye?

    UPDATE: I had this scheduled from about a week ago. Y’know what freaks me out a little? How many of these are sold out!

    Share:

    Dupe alert: Smashbox In Bloom Soft Focus Eye Liners

    While writing up a post on Annabelle’s new Mineral Powder Eyeliners, I ran into a sense of deja vu — about Smashbox’s In Bloom Eye Liners, that is. First it was just the packaging, which happens to be the same shape…

    And then it was the shades…

    And now? I’ve noticed the formulas! Check this out:

    Smashbox In Bloom: Boron Nitride, Silica, Dimethicone, Polyethylene, Pentylene Glycol, Pumice, Kaolin, Dimethiconol, Ethylhexylglycerin, Carnauba Wax, Phenoxyethanol, Dehydroacetic Acid.

    Annabelle Mineral Powder: Boron Nitride, Silica, Dimethicone, Polyethylene, Pentylene Glycol, Pumice, Kaolin, Phenoxyethanol, Dimethiconol, Ethylhexylglycerin, Dehydroacetic Acid, Carnauba Wax.

    Yep — the ingredients lists are the exact same! The last few ingredients are in a slightly different order, but (as I’m sure you all know), ingredients lists are written up in order of concentration. That is to say: these formulas are probably 80% the first three ingredients, and contain just minuscule amounts of the last ones. So, switching them up? Not going to make a huge difference in your product.

    The big difference:

    I’m not sure who thought up these liners first, but enjoy your dupes, Canucks ;) And make sure to grab ’em fast; they’re limited edition!

    Share:

    Annabelle brings us mineral eyeliner, minus the fuss.

    What they are: Annabelle Mineral Powder Eyeliners in Hex and Jinx, both part of the Holiday “etheREAL” collection.

    Why the product’s really cool: Annabelle’s new liners have a unique sponge-tip applicator, and an interesting formula to back it up. Simply put, it’s mineral eyeliner without the fuss — that is, without the fuss of loose powders, finicky brushes, and foiling mediums. There’s dimethicone worked right into the formula, and while I’m no ingredients god, I’m guessing that’s what makes the product apply smoothly with a lot of pigment (and minimal fallout). Make sure to blend, though; I’ve found these work best as soft, smudgy eyeliner or as shadow!

    Mineral Powder Eyeliners are a bit pricy at $9.95CAD for 0.6g, but Annabelle goes on sale often enough that I’m not too concerned with the price. I think it’s awesome that Annabelle’s bringing the innovative new applicator to the Canadian market; it seems like we always have to wait aaaages before getting to try out new stuff! To top it off, the shades are gorgeous, and these are a perfect dupe for high-end loose liners, like Smashbox’s $22USD In Bloom Soft Focus Powder Eye Liners (check out our full post on that later today here!)

    P.S. Have you checked out Annabelle’s Gotta Give A Gift yet? If not, you definitely should :)

    P.P.S. Sorry for the slightly funky colour tint — I know it’s a poor excuse, but we’ve been getting no proper sunlight recently! Artificial it is…

    Share:

    Going Baroque (and broke!) with Clarins Barocco

    What it is: Clarins Barocco Face Palette

    The packaging: Predictably, the packaging of this gorgeous face powder has everyone in a buzz — and it deserves all the attention it’s getting. While it’s not exactly travel-friendly, the compact is super-luxe (read: super-heavy), the design is gorgeous, and the solid build is a much-appreciated change (at least, it is for me) from the lightweight, utilitarian packaging that houses 98% of products nowadays.

    Plus, it’s just so… shiny. As I’m sure you can see by the photos, it literally lights up its surroundings with an angelic gold glow. I love it!

    The product: I was expecting the powder itself to be a pretty-in-the-pan letdown, as is often the case when items focus so heavily on the packaging. Surprisingly, though, it’s really nice! The mixture of the matte peach and shimmery light apricot gives the perfect “refined” glow, and it’s not a restricted-to-your-cheeks glow, either. It’s rare that I meet a shimmery product that I’m comfortable using as a powder (as opposed to a blush or hilighter), but this is one of them. Applied with a more dense brush, this creates a sculpted, natural cheek with a very polished feel, but with a powder brush (or puff), it sort of… diffuses the light, giving you a brightening, soft-focus effect.

    I know; it’s hard to describe. You’ll just have to trust me on this one! No matter your skintone, though, you’ll be able to wear this one — as a blusher if you’re on the pale side, as a sheer hilight if you’re darker, and as an all-over powder no matter your skintone.

    swatched in different concentrations on NW15 skin

    The verdict? You know that person on your Christmas list who’s always just so @)#*!! hard to buy for? This would be the perfect gift for her: it’s a lovely product in even lovelier packaging. Some chic wrapping paper (brown paper and red velvet ribbon sounds perfect) and you’re set.

    Alternately, it would be a stellar item to put on your wishlist — and I’d say it would make a great gift-for-yourself item, too, but I think you may find it a little hard to stomach the $55US/$65CAD price tag unless it’s to be a gift :/ For the luxury, I think it’s worth every darn penny, but most of us (myself included) don’t have that much “makeup fun money” to throw around!

    Other online availability: Macy’s, Bloomingdale’s

    More images behind the cut! Read more

    Share:

    MAC Charm Pale, bringing you a bit of NSFW for the day

    You’d think it would be polite to at least warn us, MAC. Sheesh! :P

    (But on a serious note: why on earth is a Holiday promo image for a cosmetics company NSFW? That’s ridiculous. It doesn’t personally offend me or anything, but I can think of a lot of moms who would hate for their four-year-olds to stumble across an image like this. I mean, MAC often prints out larger-than-life posters for their stores; what if this has plans to be one of them?)

    (Oh, and P.S. is it just me, or are her nails leaning really… vomit-green?)

    image via

    Share:

    Benefit’s Creaseless Creams are a bit of a lie

    What it is: Benefit Creaseless Cream Eyeshadow/Liner in RSVP

    image via StrawberryNet

    The shade: RSVP is a really lovely shade, to be honest. It’s described as a “sparkling champagne,” and I think they hit the description right on its head. The base colour is substantially darker than my skintone and about a shade darker than it appears to be on the Benefit site, but the amount of shimmer (which really can’t be described as anything but “champagne”) lightens it up enough that the product makes a fantastic lid colour and inner corner hilight.

    indirect sunlight, no flash

    The wear: Okay, here’s where RSVP was a bit of a letdown. I used it for a few days just to perk up the inner corners of my eyes, and it looked amazing — but wouldn’t last all day. I’d estimate about five hours of wear before it faded off altogether. And, yes, that’s pretty good, but I wouldn’t pay $24CAD for five hours of wear! The lid wear was even worse; the shimmer would last all day but begin to crease within two hours.

    indirect sunlight, flash support

    The verdict? RSVP is really, really pretty… but I just can’t get on the Benefit Creaseless Cream train. They work well for a lot of people, but I guess I’m just not one of them. I’ve been told by a few people to layer it over primer, but quite frankly, at $19US/$24CAD, I’d like a product that’s actually creaseless, please!

    Online availability: Benefit (if you do some poking around on their site, they have a mini RSVP for $10 right now), Sephora, Ulta, Perfume Worldwide, StrawberryNet (on sale for $17)

    Share: